On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Till Wegmüller <toaster...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20.02.2017 23:01, Aurélien Larcher wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Aurélien Larcher >> <aurelien.larc...@gmail.com <mailto:aurelien.larc...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> This is just a simple and honest question. >> I have rebuilt Firefox and Thunderbird with jemalloc disabled and >> linked to libumem. >> I am not sure if the behaviour is related to adjusting >> layout.frame_rate=24 or the memory alloc but Thunderbird seems less >> "bloated". >> Any experience? >> >> >> >> (the underlying question being about memory fragmentation and such) >> >> > Do we have this kind of Situation ? > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422055 I do not know, I was just curious since Bryan Cantrill's horror stories on jemalloc. So I was wondering about the "why" of messing with it instead of using libumem. > > > Greetings > Toasterson > > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > oi-dev@openindiana.org > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev > -- --- Praise the Caffeine embeddings
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev