Thanks for all that information. I guess I need to read this stuff before I do anything.
2017-05-16 18:09 GMT+02:00 Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]>: > On 05/16/17 08:47 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: > >> On 05/16/17 05:54 PM, Dariusz Sendkowski wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> It seems that Glade can be bumped to 3.19 (already checked), which is the >>> highest version that does not require bumping GTK+. >>> >>> I see that current Glade is built only for 32 arch. Should the new >>> version >>> be also built only for 32, both 32 and 64 or maybe only 64? >>> >> >> Hi. >> There are a lot of components, dependent on libglade, so it should be >> preserver >> for both bits. Also check that our glade generates gtk2 interfaces and >> should >> continue doing so until gtk3 is not default gtk version. >> > > Be careful to distinguish between libglade, which loads Glade version 2 > files & > has been deprecated upstream for over a decade, and the Glade 3.x > application > which generates GtkBuilder files, read by the GtkBuilder API's in libgtk > 2.12 > and later: > > https://developer.gnome.org/gtk2/stable/gtk-migrating-GtkBuilder.html > https://www.simple-is-better.org/gtk/ > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glade_Interface_Designer > > (Things I all had to learn when figuring out how to deal with this on our > side, > in which I recently removed libglade altogether as it's not needed in > GNOME 3.) > > -alan- > > > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev >
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
