Brian McCallister wrote:
On Feb 3, 2004, at 7:03 AM, Armin Waibel wrote:
doh! Assume the current implementation doesn't achieve this.
?! See my previous post. Also, the code in the howto was tested!
Can you show me an test were a PK field was declared anonymous. I have written some test cases for anonymous fields, but only using anonymous attributes for the fk id field of the reference.
regards, Armin
-Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
