Hi, Maven is able to automatically download jars that may not be redistributed. I asked Jason id we can use Maven to download the SUN jars. But unfortunately we are not allowed to do this automatically! It seems they want everyone to give everyone the "click through our download site"-experience.
cheers, Thomas > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Matthew Baird [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Februar 2003 16:46 > An: OJB Users List > Betreff: RE: 0.9.9 doesn't build > > > can we make the build script go get the jars if they are > missing, or is that a violation of license too? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hiran Chaudhuri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Mon 2/17/2003 11:53 PM > To: OJB Users List > Cc: > Subject: Re: 0.9.9 doesn't build > > > > Maybe the build script (ant) could check for existence > and make verbose > messages like "The file lib\foo.jar" ist still missing. > Please download it > from http://www.foo.org";...? > > A readme must be read, and anyone just trying to build > will spend time > searching the error, but if such build error occur this > time is saved. > > Hiran > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Thomas Mahler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:35 PM > Subject: Re: 0.9.9 doesn't build > > > > Hi again Chris, > > > > You will have noticed, that the mentioned jars (and > some others) are > > include in the actual 0.9.9 relase. > > We are currently preparing for a completely apache > hosted distribution. > > We are not allowed to have jars with certain licenses > (GPL, LPGL, SUN > > binary code license) in CVS or in our distributions. > > > > I'd also prefer to ship everything needed, but we are > simply not allowed > > to do so :-( > > > > But we will provide a dependency page listing all > jars we depend on, and > > where to get them. > > > > cheers, > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > Chris Rossi wrote: > > > Chris Rossi wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> ok. i'll see if i can pull latest. > > > > > > > > > > ok i've pulled the latest from CVS and can't build > because it can't find > > > some libraries: > > > > > > javax.servlet.* > > > javax.transaction.* > > > javax.sql.* > > > javax.ejb.* > > > > > > maybe one or two others i didn't notice just now > scrolling through the > > > build errors. anyway, while i can certainly now go > track down these > > > libraries and add them to my db-ojb/lib so i can > build, it seems like it > > > would be faster if ojb shipped with what it need to > build out of the > > > box. is there a philosophical or technical reason > not to do so? > > > > > > rossi > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
