Hi Jeff, Sounds like that is startup overhead. We do not see this low level of performance in our application.
-----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 2:36 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: speed question Is 450ms the average time it takes or is it the first time the ejb container takes a request? Jeff On Tuesday 11 March 2003 09:44 am, you wrote: > We're experiencing a speed difference we can't explain. We've tried the > following code in two circumstances: > > Date start = new Date(); > PersistenceManager manager = factory.getPersistenceManager(); > PersistenceBrokerFactory.defaultPersistenceBroker().clearCache(); > manager.currentTransaction().begin(); > String filter = "registrationNumber == 2"; > Query query = manager.newQuery(AircraftValue.class,filter); > Collection all = (Collection)query.execute(); > Interator result = all.iterator(); > Date end = new Date(); > > When packaged in a .war and invoked by a .jsp, the code executes in > about 15 ms. When packaged in an ejbLoad() method on a BMP, it takes > about 450 ms. The OJB.properties and registry.xml files are identical in > both cases (copied from OJB 0.9.9), and we're using a datasource to SQL > Server. Is this speed difference resulting from being executed inside a > BMP transaction? Or is something else going on? > Thanks in advance, > Don > --- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
