I'm not so worried about the absolute value of the time. Its the relative difference when we put the code inside an EJB that is bothersome. Just wondering if there is something we're missing regarding configuration, or if we can reasonably expect the timings to be similar.
Thanks for your help,
Don
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is 450ms the average time it takes or is it the first time the ejb container takes a request?
Jeff
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 09:44 am, you wrote:
We're experiencing a speed difference we can't explain. We've tried the following code in two circumstances:
Date start = new Date(); PersistenceManager manager = factory.getPersistenceManager(); PersistenceBrokerFactory.defaultPersistenceBroker().clearCache(); manager.currentTransaction().begin(); String filter = "registrationNumber == 2"; Query query = manager.newQuery(AircraftValue.class,filter); Collection all = (Collection)query.execute(); Interator result = all.iterator(); Date end = new Date();
When packaged in a .war and invoked by a .jsp, the code executes in about 15 ms. When packaged in an ejbLoad() method on a BMP, it takes about 450 ms. The OJB.properties and registry.xml files are identical in both cases (copied from OJB 0.9.9), and we're using a datasource to SQL Server. Is this speed difference resulting from being executed inside a BMP transaction? Or is something else going on? Thanks in advance, Don ---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://shopnow.netscape.com/
