I wanted to and do the same thing, and I now use this trick:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg04141.html
HTH, Colin
Philippe Boisaubert wrote:
About using/design with ODMG API :
Generally I want to get a domain (business) object from the persistence layer. Then I use it in my app (webapp), modify it and when modification are validated, update it in the persistent storage. I use a class for persistence actions (CRUD) like this :
class BookPersistence {
static BookPersistence getInstance() {...} Book getBook(String bookId) { ...} void storeBook(Book b) { ...} void deleteBook(Book b) { ...} void updateBook(Book b) { ...} }
And I use it like this : Book b = new Book(); BookPersistence.getInstance().store(b); ...
And : Book b1 = BookPersistence.getInstance().getBook("bookID"); b1.setXXX(...); ... BookPersistence.getInstance().updateBook(b1);
Whith an update method like this :
public void updateBook(Book b) {
tx.begin();
tx.lock(myBook , Transaction.WRITE); tx.commit;
}
It doesn work 'cause book is modified outside the transaction and OJB doesn't "monitor" it (I think).
Same things with :
public void updateBook(Book b) { tx.begin(); OQLQuery query = odmg.newOQLQuery(); query.create("select book from "+ Book.class.getName()+ " where code=\""+ b.getCode()+ "\""); DList results = (DList) query.execute(); Book myBook = (Book) results.get(0); tx.lock(myBook , Transaction.WRITE); tx.commit; }
But I can't open a transaction during all the modification time of my object and commit at the end, isn't it ? If I use this object in a webapp (modification by a form), I must wait all the validation (and request, validation, ...) before commiting. It retains lock during this time (even if I use optimistic locking, a long time transaction can desynchronize data with multiple users). And I've got to add Transaction demarcation in my business process code.
So I try to declare the object dirty in my transaction like this :
public void updateBook(Book b) {
tx.begin(); tx.lock(b, Transaction.WRITE); ((TransactionImpl)tx).makeDirty(b);
tx.commit;
}
It works but it's not a standardized process (the makeDirty() of TransactionImpl object is not part of ODMG API and force db calls even if the object is not modified).
So what's the solution ? Am I obliged to modify the object properties inside the transaction ? Do I use bad patterns ? Is there any trick ?
Thanx
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
