I do understand now why Sun's figures still reference value objects in the description of the transfer object.
Looks like I'm a too much Sun-centric reader...
Thanks anyway for the tip!
Hal Arnold wrote:
Not to be a prig, but the term "value object" has a specific meaning
> and is not the same as a data transfer object. This confusion has > been amended in the J2EE patterns book (Alur/Malks/Crupi) in the > second edition because of all the confusion it caused.
see: http://martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/valueObject.html
-----Original Message----- From: Philippe Hacquin Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 2:26 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: Changing object properties outside the transaction ...
Hi,
using such "view objects" is a common J2EE pattern (the value object, or data transfer object). I use it extensively in Struts and OJB applications. It
<snip>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
