Hi Gus, > -----Original Message----- > From: Gus Heck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 4:42 PM > To: OJB Users List > Subject: Re: JDO Query Performance > > > > > > > SO all you can do for the moment is to wait for our own full JDO > > implementation that will not have such limitations. > > > So when does this start?
In fact it has already started. Have a look at the folder src/java/org/apache/ojb/jdo in the source distribution. This new implementation is a thin layer on top of the OTM API. SOme things are still missing: 1. a JDOQL Parser 2. a bytecode enhancer 3. an extension to the repositoryPersistor that allows to use a .JDO file instead of a repository.xml > Will it use the current JDO related > classes or > rewrite them? It will be a complete rewrite, as we won't rely on the JDORI any longer... > I might be interested in pitching in, a bit > when it does > if I can find a small chunk or two to work on. (I probably can't do a > whole lot of work, but it would be fun to help to some extent). > That would be great, all help is welcome! Maybe you just have look at the existing code and check if you find a spot that you'd like to work on... cu, Thomas > -Gus > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
