Hi again Gus, <snip> > > > Cool. I'll peek at it some time, like maybe tonight or next > weekend....
great! > 1 and 3 look interesting. I know nothing about bytecode > however... What > about an xdoclet based source code enhancer as an additional option? sounds OK! But at some point in time we will have to ship a bytecodeenhancer too... > what java version compatability do you need to maintain for > ojb stuff? JDK 1.2! > Do you have a developer doc that has all those details > somewhere? Not really... There is only a rough outline for the design of the future JDO implementation: http://db.apache.org/ojb/jdo-proposal.html > I hope > it's not 1.1, I hate working with enumerations :). you are lucky! you make heavy use of Iterators ;-) > > >>Will it use the current JDO related > >>classes or > >>rewrite them? > >> > >> > > > >It will be a complete rewrite, as we won't rely on the JDORI > any longer... > > > > > ok so the migration from the jdori based stuff to the native > stuff will > probably not be trivial then... I agree, that's far from beeing trivial! But the good news: the *real* work, (i.e. instance lifecycle management, object level transactions, O/R mapping) is mostly done. > I hope the jdori based > version will be > maintained for those who are using it. I think from the user perspective the change should be almost unperceptible. You'll simply have to use a different ManagerFactory class... cheers, Thomas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
