Hi Daniel, <snip> > My questions: > > 1 - Do I really need to maintain both mappings?? > (repository.xml and *.jdo > files??) With the current solution: YES. The Repository.xml files are needed for ojb: The jdo file is needed for the bytecode-enhancer.
For the future jso implementation it is planned to exclusively rely on one jdo file. > 2 - In case I can use a mapping similar to the one in Product;jdo file > (check above), do I need to provide it in every *.jdo file > (package or class > related) or is there a place where I can put these mappings > that will fit to > the JDO RI as a whole? > The information in the jdo file is not needed for mapping purposes, it's only feeding the JDORI bytecode-enhancer. As far as I know you must have one jdo file per package with the current version of the enhancer. Thomas > Thanks in advance, > Daniel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
