All right!!! Thanks Thomas...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mahler Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'OJB Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:08 AM Subject: RE: JDO and OJB mappings > Hi Daniel, > > <snip> > > My questions: > > > > 1 - Do I really need to maintain both mappings?? > > (repository.xml and *.jdo > > files??) > With the current solution: YES. The Repository.xml files are needed for ojb: > The jdo file is needed for the bytecode-enhancer. > > For the future jso implementation it is planned to exclusively rely on one > jdo file. > > > 2 - In case I can use a mapping similar to the one in Product;jdo file > > (check above), do I need to provide it in every *.jdo file > > (package or class > > related) or is there a place where I can put these mappings > > that will fit to > > the JDO RI as a whole? > > > The information in the jdo file is not needed for mapping purposes, it's > only feeding the JDORI bytecode-enhancer. > As far as I know you must have one jdo file per package with the current > version of the enhancer. > > Thomas > > > Thanks in advance, > > Daniel > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
