Hi Dennis,
Dennis Bekkering wrote:
Sorry, nope! At the beginning of OJB some people plan to support beside
RDBMS and other persistence datastores, but it was too complex to
realize with a few OJB committer.
Thanks for clearing out, where exactly lies the complexity, the quering i
solved my own project.
E.g. to support ODBMS we have to adapt the PB-api and rewrite internal
classes because many of them are tied to RDBMS.
I have the biggest problem with activationdepth,
with
OJB there isn't such concept (aka lazy loading). Dunno of that is
db4objects
specific or also SODA. With how many are you working currently on OJB?
About four active committer.
regards,
Armin
Cheers,
Dennis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
