Well, so do I :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jens Kr�mer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: Bug in PersistenceBrokerImpl.java
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:30:59AM +0200, Rudi Alberda wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > Some time ago I mailed some problems I had using proxy m:n collections
in
> > combination with other proxy m:n collection objects; Setting one seemed
to
> > clear the other (which is clearly not what we want). I traced the
problem
> > back to what I think is a bug in PersistenceBrokerImpl.java; what
happens is
> > that every time an object is stored and the reference collections are
stored
> > as well, the entries in the indirection table are deleted and later
added
> > again, _except_ when the collection is proxy and not loaded yet. Which
means
> > the loss of reference collections. I switched the two checks which
solves
> > the bug for me; below is the code I switched around.
> >
> > // MBAIRD
> > // if the collection is a collectionproxy and it's not already loaded
> > // no need to store it.
> > if (col instanceof CollectionProxy &&
!((CollectionProxy)col).isLoaded())
> > {
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > if (cds.isMtoNRelation())
> > {
> > /* LEANDRO
> > * Clear all MtoN implementors.
> > * All new MtoN implementors are going to be added bellow
> > */
> > //logger.info("STORE COLLECTIONS: deleting all MtoN
implementors
> > for field "+cds.getPersistentField().getName());
> > deleteMtoNImplementor(cds, obj);
> > }
> >
>
>
> I think I understand the problem and I wonder why this fix hasn't been
> integrated into CVS yet ?
>
> Greetings,
> Jens
>
> --
> Jens Kr�mer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
