On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Pieter Colpaert <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > Concerning the license option: you can now select "other" and then > indicate whether it is an "open" license. This is shifting the problem > towards the question "is this really an open license"? As a solution, I > believe ODI should also keep a list of licenses for data that are really > open. Organisations world-wide should be able to get the label "open > license" from ODI and only these licenses should appear in the list. > > I completely agree. I see ODI (in this discussion) as playing a similar role to OSI for F/OSS. If that's a fair analogy then let's go for it. P. -- Peter Murray-Rust Reader in Molecular Informatics Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry University of Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069
_______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
