I think an infobox isn't a bad idea, but I admit I have no idea what the top-level concept is - "free and open information"?
[Also, this is where I admit that, despite being a Wikimedia employee, we've passed beyond my level of understanding around the intricacies of big rewrites like this, so everyone should take what I say with a grain of salt :) On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Chris Sakkas <[email protected]> wrote: > Great idea for a project. There's also > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libre > and > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis_versus_libre > > Also, consider related concepts like: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_copyright_license (a broad category that > encompasses all FLO licences) > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft (a type of FLO) > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharealike (a term in public copyright > licences) > > And don't forget the Categories (Category:Free software etc.) > > --- > > You know how there are info boxes for certain subjects (Anarchism, > Presidents of the US, etc.). Would FLO be a good candidate for an info-box? > That would hopefully discourage redundancy by showing where everything fits > in. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > Chris Sakkas > Admin of the FOSsil Bank wiki and the Living Libre blog and Twitter feed. > > > On 6 July 2013 21:14, Gene Shackman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> add in >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_knowledge >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libre_knowledge >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Knowledge >> >> Gene >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Luis Villa <[email protected]> >> To: Gene Shackman <[email protected]>; Open Knowledge Foundation >> discussion list <[email protected]> >> Sent: Saturday, July 6, 2013 8:13 PM >> Subject: Re: [okfn-discuss] list of all open knowledge/data organizations >> >> There are enough now that it is probably hard to list them all, in any way >> that is up to date. >> >> Tangentially, the Wikipedia pages around "free" and "open" ______ are a >> total mess of redundant, poorly organized information. Some folks >> here might be ideal candidates to merge or otherwise rationalize them: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_license >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_license >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_content >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_data >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_license >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software_license >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_content >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software >> >> Luis >> >> On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Gene Shackman <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Is there such a thing as a list, on the web, of all open knowledge, open >> > data organizations, websites, associations, etc? >> > >> > Gene >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> okfn-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss >> > > > _______________________________________________ > okfn-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss > Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss > _______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
