P. S. is there any relevant change that we should all be aware of or just details?
2014-10-06 20:07 GMT-03:00 Everton Zanella Alvarenga <[email protected]>: > Hi. > > In my opinion, important changes of the open definition (OD) should be > sent to the *okfn-discuss* and* okfn-local-coord *mailing lists, since a > lot of our is based on the OD. > > If that was not the case (I cannot check if there is some relevant > improvement now), I kindly ask for we have some extra time for we check > with our local collaborators at the open knowledge network for a proof > reading. > > If we don't have time for some reason and there is some substantial change > that affect all of us, well, patience. > > Tom > > 2014-10-06 19:36 GMT-03:00 Aaron Wolf <[email protected]>: > > I'm sorry I didn't follow up on it, but here's what happened: >> >> Over on the OD discussion list, there was a call for voting as to whether >> we had reached the final v2. >> >> My comment is here: >> https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/2014-August/000974.html >> >> I never added my +1 (despite being perfectly happy with our result). I >> said instead that we needed to engage the larger list before *any* >> statement that there was any official anything (especially given the logo >> issues). Apparently, I was just ignored. >> >> I still object to the way people active on the OD list just went and >> said, "ok, we all discussed and worked out things, we're all happy, now we >> announce to the world." I was actually there to say, "no, we need to tell >> the broader OK community about what we've got and get feedback before any >> announcements otherwise" but I failed to keep bugging people about that, >> and I guess nobody else shared my concerns enough to reply to my post or >> otherwise do this the right way. >> >> Regards, >> Aaron Wolf (just a volunteer who decided to help on the OD list) >> >> >> -- >> Aaron Wolf >> wolftune.com >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Samuel Azoulay <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I just noticed that the autumn newsletter of the Open Knowledge >>> addresses the launch of the "Open Definition 2.0". >>> >>> Either I missed it and I apologize if this is the case, or the whole >>> community has not been consulted or even informed of the procedure of >>> renewal of the Open Definition. I think this is unfortunate, especially >>> regarding such a crucial topic who contributes to shape the image of the >>> Open Knowledge by setting standards which are broadly used. >>> >>> It was apparently planned >>> <https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/2014-September/001021.html> to >>> inform OK's lists (discuss, local-coord...) in advance but this has not >>> been done unless I'm mistaken (1 >>> <https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/2014-September/001021.html> >>> and 2 >>> <https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/2014-October/thread.html> >>> ). >>> >>> Could you give us some news? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Samuel Azoulay >>> OK France >>> >>> -- >>> *Samuel Azoulay* >>> >>> Twitter : @Sam_azl >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> okfn-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> okfn-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss >> >> > > > -- > Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom) > Open Knowledge Brasil - Rede pelo Conhecimento Livre > http://br.okfn.org > -- Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom) Open Knowledge Brasil - Rede pelo Conhecimento Livre http://br.okfn.org
_______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
