Quoting Ed Summers <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Lee Passey <[email protected]> wrote: >> So before any questions about how best to represent a person in RDF can >> be addressed, you should try to find out who will be consuming the data, >> and what their expectations are. > > I think this is an important point, and is largely why I'm in favor of > leveraging existing vocabularies for people (foaf) in the rdf views, > so that ol authors fit into the existing ecosystem of rdf data about > people, some of whom happen to have written books.
In fact, if you look at the latest version of the rdf author record I sent out earlier today, I used foaf in every place possible, since that is the preferred form that has been expressed. Unfortunately, that doesn't result in a large number of foaf elements in the record, and if I have missed any that could be used, please let me know. kc > > //Ed > _______________________________________________ > Ol-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > [email protected] > -- Karen Coyle [email protected] http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet _______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
