Hi I already asked OL support for possible bugs, features and evolutions about the authors data into works or editions into the RDF API.
I will be very useful for sure ! Thanx all. 2012/1/5, Karen Coyle <[email protected]>: > Quoting Ben Companjen <[email protected]>: > > The Work's >> record description, however, is not linked to the work description. >> Only to agents who interpret parts of the URI may the relationship >> between a frbr:Work and something identified by "http:// ... /about/" >> be clear. >> I think this may be solved by saying >> <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> >> <dcterms:created>...</dcterms:created> >> <dcterms:modified>...</dcterms:modified> >> </rdf:Desciption> >> since rdf:about="" means 'about this document'. > > That's a neat trick - I'll want to remember that. However, the > created/modified refer to the OL record, so the /about/ bit was > supposed to work like the /about/ of the 'cool uri' document. We use > the OL URI to identify the Work not the record about the work, so we > were struggling with a way to give information about the OL Work > *record.* > > That said, if it's clearer I don't see a reason not to use 'about this > document'. I don't know of a case where it makes a difference. > > >> >> I committed an adaptation of the Work RDF template in my fork (this is >> my first day on Github, but I think I'm starting to get the hang of >> it), but I was not sure what other people think* about losing the >> trailing slash in Work and Edition URIs, so I left them in at first. I >> committed an additional change, that removes the trailing slashes. >> *: in the RDF improvement bug report, >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/openlibrary/+bug/703664, Karen says all >> URIs should end with "/". > > Yes, some folks on this list when we were first developing the RDF > felt strongly about that. > >> >> Please have a look (if you can) at >> https://github.com/bencomp/openlibrary/blob/patch-1/openlibrary/plugins/openlibrary/templates/type/work/rdf.html >> and >> https://github.com/bencomp/openlibrary/blob/patch-1/openlibrary/plugins/openlibrary/templates/type/edition/rdf.html >> and comment on it. If all is okay, I will send a pull request. > > Is there a way to test this without moving it into production? Also, > there may be people using the RDF API and it would be good to give > them notice before a change. > > kc > > > -- > Karen Coyle > [email protected] http://kcoyle.net > ph: 1-510-540-7596 > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet > > _______________________________________________ > Ol-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > [email protected] > -- Sébastien Feugère selfshelfswap.org / Wiki <http://selfshelfswap.org/wiki/> / Launchpad<https://launchpad.net/bibliothek-project> Ask a question <https://answers.launchpad.net/bibliothek-project> / Report a bug <https://bugs.launchpad.net/bibliothek-project> _______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
