On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Karen Coyle <[email protected]> wrote:
> This would mean adding some fields to OL. However, I really do think > that person-hood is an important concept and one worth keeping. It's a > bit complex because it means having two kinds of "collaborator" - person > and corporate entity. Perhaps there could be a "responsible > organization" added to take the known corporate entities? > +1 - my colleagues find it particularly annoying that I won't commit to foaf:Person for the identities, but I think that our customers would be even more annoyed to see "Great Britain" described as a person, so I stick to my pedantic guns. -Ross. _______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
