Ben, I don't know of any that have implemented the FRBR relationships *yet*. That leaves the arena wide open, and being the first to do this would be very interesting!
kc On 11/18/12 2:23 PM, Ben Companjen wrote: > Of course, FRBR! I could have thought of that (and CiTO) :) > So the thinking of relationships we might need has already been done > and "only" the thinking of how to record these relationships and > designing and implementing changes to the interface are left. > > Are there other catalogues that show any of the FRBR work relationships? > > On 18 November 2012 17:21, Karen Coyle <[email protected]> wrote: >> FRBR provides a set of relationships between works and it would be good >> to have links that are meaningful, not just "link." "Cites" isn't one of >> them, but there are citation vocabularies. If there were more lists in >> OL those could be mined for statistical relationships. Librarything is >> able to do this so they can give a small set of the most related books. >> >> - my "cheat sheet" of FRBR relationships: >> http://kcoyle.net/rda/group1relsby.html >> it shouldn't be too hard to make a selection of a small number of >> these for OL use >> - the CITO vocabulary: >> >> http://speroni.web.cs.unibo.it/cgi-bin/lode/req.py?req=http:/purl.org/spar/cito >> again, a small selection might be useful >> >> kc >> >> >> On 11/18/12 5:22 AM, Ben Companjen wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Although I know the developers are mostly working on non-OL projects, >>> I would like to share a (possibly very old) idea for enhancement of >>> Open Library: direct links from one work to another. >>> >>> It is not an original idea, as most digital libraries for scientific >>> literature have links from articles to cited/referenced articles or >>> book chapters. For me as a student it has become a natural way of >>> browsing the "library". >>> Today I wanted to look up the Thesaurus of English words and phrases >>> by Peter Mark Roget and found not only the multiple works (which >>> should most likely be one work) by Roget, but also "Roget's thesaurus >>> ..." by other authors - edited versions, perhaps reviews or manuals, >>> etc. >>> >>> I think being able to say "works A and B are related, because A is (a >>> review of | a manual to | partly based on | ...) B" would be a great >>> addition to Open Library as a catalog. (And I didn't see this idea in >>> the list of issues on GitHub.) >>> >>> Ben >>> >>> P.S. Yes, you could add a hyperlink to the work, but if you used the >>> label to express the relationship between works, it would only make >>> sense to human users. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ol-tech mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech >>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> -- >> Karen Coyle >> [email protected] http://kcoyle.net >> ph: 1-510-540-7596 >> m: 1-510-435-8234 >> skype: kcoylenet >> _______________________________________________ >> Ol-tech mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to >> [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > Ol-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > [email protected] > -- Karen Coyle [email protected] http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet _______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
