On 3/16/13 4:14 AM, kltrg wrote:
> > 2. What is OL aiming for? That is a whole other subjet. Having a (seperate) > wiki doesn't solve this question at all, I agree. But nobody said it would. > So yes, we should discuss this question (on this list) but not mixing it up > with the wiki question. > There's not much we can do/say about this one since it isn't up to us. OL is a project of the Internet Archive and the Archive decides its direction. As users of the project we can show how we are using it, and that might influence the direction, but the project owners are the "deciders." It seems to me to be rather fruitless to have any lengthy discussion on this topic. kc > Lars Aronsson: >> Before discussing a new tool, what are we trying to achieve? >> What else is needed, and what role does OpenLibrary >> play? > > I don't see other projects having so many structured information about works > and it's editions. OL is machine readable. I think that should be the goal: > Having as much structured information about any work we can. > > kltrg > _______________________________________________ > Ol-tech mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > [email protected] > -- Karen Coyle [email protected] http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet _______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
