Could we please split up those two threads: 1. Where can we create a documentation to list standards, related projects and any other consensual information about OL?
Anand Chitipothu: > I didn't understand the motivation. Is this for discussing about OL or > something completely different? Open Library is a wiki. We've setup > permissions to protect some pages from spam, but it is very easy to setup a > place where everyone can edit. Thanks, Anand. Presumably, that's what we've all been waiting for. Lets create this "community" section. 2. What is OL aiming for? That is a whole other subjet. Having a (seperate) wiki doesn't solve this question at all, I agree. But nobody said it would. So yes, we should discuss this question (on this list) but not mixing it up with the wiki question. Lars Aronsson: > Before discussing a new tool, what are we trying to achieve? > What else is needed, and what role does OpenLibrary > play? I don't see other projects having so many structured information about works and it's editions. OL is machine readable. I think that should be the goal: Having as much structured information about any work we can. kltrg _______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list [email protected] http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to [email protected]
