Thanks Tom, I'd had another quick look at those accounts and found that there were a lot of edit spammers that day, rather than the new additions which seems to be the current favourite spam method. Anand seems to have reverted the edits spam already, but I found some users that had made no edits. I imagine that's what the bulk of the this list is? I hadn't had time last week to work out the full pattern to collect them all, so this list is very helpful, thanks! I can automate the deletions from the list using an existing script.
Cheers, Charles. On 9 January 2016 at 11:43, Tom Morris <tfmor...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here's the list of 1486 accounts that match this pattern created 8 am to 8 > pm on November 26, 2012. > > Tom > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:51 PM, jessamyn c. west <jessa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> They're not locked, no, or at least that last one wasn't. So yes, if >> you generate the lists of accounts we can get them to Charles and he >> can automatedly delete them. >> >> ________ >> Jessamyn >> >> librarian.net ::: jessamyn.com ::: jessamyn.info ::: box 345, randolph >> vt 05060 >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Tom Morris <tfmor...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:18 PM, jessamyn c. west <jessa...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > This doesn't include the 2000 account from Nov, 2012 e.g. >> >> > https://openlibrary.org/people/nanapbioblis1974 They don't appear >> to >> >> > have >> >> > been deleted. Have they at least been locked/disabled? >> >> >> >> I'm afraid I'm not sure what you are referring to. I blocked and >> >> reverted the edits by that one user just now, but if there's a >> >> pattern, please work with Charles and we can block/revert the other >> >> ones but I think I've lost the thread of where you mentioned these? >> > >> > >> > Everything was in my last message. As far as I can tell. Anandbot >> reverted >> > all the edits (see link in my previous message) and I'm assuming that >> Anand >> > would have disabled/locked the accounts at the same time, so I'm not >> sure >> > anything else needs to be done. >> > >> > I can generate a list of the 1486 accounts involved if you want to >> revert >> > them all, but it seems like a lot of work, which should be unnecessary >> if >> > Anand locked them, as I suspect he would have. >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Ol-tech mailing list >> > ol-tech@archive.org >> > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech >> > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/ol-tech@archive.org/ >> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to >> > ol-tech-unsubscr...@archive.org >> _______________________________________________ >> Ol-tech mailing list >> ol-tech@archive.org >> http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech >> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/ol-tech@archive.org/ >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to >> ol-tech-unsubscr...@archive.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Ol-tech mailing list > ol-tech@archive.org > http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech > Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/ol-tech@archive.org/ > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to > ol-tech-unsubscr...@archive.org >
_______________________________________________ Ol-tech mailing list ol-tech@archive.org http://mail.archive.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ol-tech Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/ol-tech@archive.org/ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send email to ol-tech-unsubscr...@archive.org
