Scott White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all-
We could argue forever about a precise definition of a musclecar.
I've always differentiated "muscle" from "sports," so no Corvette is a
musclecar. I also have thought that a true musclecar needed to be available
in a a 4dr version of the same body platform. All of the early version
musclecars were A bodies and had a 4dr equivalent...I'm not sure if this is
true of of later models. This knocks out Mustangs (not sure if it has
already been eliminated by the "sports" car clause). It would also
eliminate every version of the Toronado.
Speaking of the Toronado, rear wheel drive needs to be a requirement.
V-8 is a requirement.
Tbe a "true" musclecar, it needs to be a "classic." But then we're stuck
with trying to pin a date on things. I can't remember when Dodge or Ford
de-tuned thier engines to meet with emissions requirements, but I don't
think anything GM after 1972 would really qualify.
As for the Quad 442 Calais? It's a quick car that might hold it's own in a
race against a true musclecar, but it is not in the same class as a
musclecar, being a transverse mounted 4cyl. front wheel drive vehicle, and
it is not the same CLASS as a musclecar.
Scott White
_________________________________________________________________
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

