Sounds like my 89 s-10 with a 402 small block cheby.
Was  fun to show off with but you could only drive the dam thing in 4 whl
high.
 It got old fast. And a pinto could kick its butt out of the hole. Because
all I did was spin the tires.
ron

rodney fama OCA #033098
1969 cutlass s
1969 442 north carolinia car
1969 442  cali car. assembly required stay away from www.calicars.cc what a
hassle.
1972 cutlass convertable
1976 phx y-76 arizona regional car. assy. required
1977 cutlass supreme  (3)
1986 honda shadow vt 1100c  cruiser
1987 cutlass supreme
1989 chevy k-2500 4*4 pick up
1991 yamaha warrior atv
1994 chevy  caprice 9c-1 police pkg
732-986-6388 cell
732-254-9500 wk 2 pm best time to call week days
web site. shows disc brake conversion using 79 trans am rear disc on my 77
cutlass,and my 77 restoration project, along with other toys

http://home.comcast.net/~77w30442/wsb/html/view.cgi-contact.html-.html

http://home.comcast.net/~77w30442/wsb/html/view.cgi-photos.html-MerchantID-2
21197-Publish-t-makestatic-true-skip-45.html

you may have to copy and paste the address to web browser.


 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kerry Doyle
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 8:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 442 Achieva

AWD-  So there you have it.  A JEEP Wagoneer with an
Olds 455 driving a built "Quadra Trac".  Plenty low
end to smoke all 4 and blow any stang away off the
line.  It didn't handle well and front wheel hop was a
problem and it didn't steer at WOT worth a darn.
I don't think it qualifies as a Muscle Car -  But it
was lots of fun! 
Kerry

--- David Manly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Wow..
> 
> I am going to take a totally different thought on
> this. I believe in AWD 
> systems. Makes rear wheel drive AND fwd suck at both
> traction and handling.

Reply via email to