John,

>   I followed your postings on zinc and phosphoros additive for motor oil a 
> while back. I use the GM stuff myself. I am courious as to what years this 
> is necessary
> to keep engine wear to a minimum. thru the 80's into the 90's?
> thanks


Any year where the engine uses a cast iron billet camshaft and cast iron 
alloy lifters requires zinc and phosphorous for camshaft and lifter wear 
protection, including aftermarket cast iron billet performance cams. Any 
year where the engine is equipped with a hydraulic roller camshaft and 
hydraulic roller lifters doesn't matter, for ***all*** hydraulic roller 
camshafts are steel billet and the rollers on the hydraulic roller lifters 
are steel alloy compatible with the steel billet roller camshaft. Simply 
put, cast iron needs zinc and phosphorous and steel does not.

But, zinc and phosphorous ***will*** promote improved ring to cylinder wall 
sealing in any engine, no matter what.

Personally, I'd tell the EPA to go to Hell and use an oil that has healthy 
zinc and phosphorous additives in any engine, regardless. API SJ grade oils 
still have very healthy zinc and phosphorous content, while SL and SM grades 
had the content reduced greatly, respectively. SJ grade is listed for 
engines in 2001 and older. SL is for 2002 to 2004. SM is 2005 and 
later.That's the giveaway this issue is all about emission politics and not 
about science and engineering. So far, all the studies done to prove zinc 
and phosphorous will harm catalytic converters have been inconclusive. In a 
couple of engineering tests, there was evidence that zinc and phosphorous 
actually improved the catalytic converter efficiency. But the EPA wants 
those 2 additives gone, for it will mean older engines will eventually die, 
which is exactly what the EPA empire wants. Older engines and cars can't be 
banned by law, for the U.S. Constitution forbids it.

The LBJ left liberals created the EPA to work on emotion, not science. No 
succeeding administration has been able to change it that much to require 
science, instead. A friend of mine works for the EPA. He has both a MS in 
mechanical engineering with honors and a MS in chemical engineering with 
honors. He'll state the above to anyone who will take the time to listen. My 
friend likes to tilt at windmills by working for the EPA to try to change it 
and give it some common sense.

Milton Schick
1964 442 Cutlass
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Reply via email to