Crispin Boylan escreveu: > On 09/11/13 20:48, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote: >> Hi, >> given everyone has been ignoring the freeze anyway and Cooker is >> already totally unusable, I'd say we may as well officially un-freeze >> Cooker (that, or ban almost everyone for ignoring the freeze ;) )... >> >> What do others think? >> >> ttyl >> bero >> >> > happy with that. > > i think it would be better if next time we freeze for a period, then > branch for release and unfreeze cooker simultaneously. i'm not sure the > extended 'freeze' has helped us any this time. > > having said that, it would be nice to actually be able to enforce the > freeze!
What really is required is to not break cooker. If freezing, should forbid commits, but one month would be the absolute maximum amount of time. Slowly, now, we should also add acls, because breakage will happen, but better to have few people being able to break components that would make it unusable, or worse, not recoverable and/or corrupt data. > thanks > cris. Paulo
