On Friday, November 15, 2013 03:21:21 PM Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote: > Updated isos, in case someone wants to test: > > https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/openmandriva2013.0/products/53/product_bu > ild_lists/1951 > https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/openmandriva2013.0/products/54/product_b > uild_lists/1950 > > IMO we can just go ahead with the old ones though... But OTOH there > really shouldn't be much of a difference. > > ttyl > bero > > On 2013-11-15 12:14, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: > > Come on let's have fast decision on this. > > > > I'm for a tested ISO with one launcher that has won the contest rather > > than a delay. > > > > Wysłano z BlackBerry® w Orange > > ------------------------- > > > > FROM: Anurag Bhandari <[email protected]> > > DATE: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:38:37 +0530 > > TO: tpgxyz<[email protected]>; Cooker > > OpenMandriva<[email protected]> > > CC: OpenMandriva QA<[email protected]> > > SUBJECT: Re: [OM Cooker] Odp.: Re: GO/No-GO RC2 candidate 15 Nov 2013 > > > > I agree with TPG. It's wiser to go with a tested ISO (even though with > > one launcher) than an untested one if we want the release to be done > > today (an explanation about the launcher could be given in the > > announcement). Or we could wait for a couple days more for Bero's new > > ISOs to be tested and then do the RC2 release (an apology for delay > > could be given in announcement). > > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Tomasz Paweł Gajc <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > >> We can not afford for a delay, because there should be two launchers > >> anf finally there is one. > >> > >> RC2 release must be done today. > >> > >> Wysłano z BlackBerry® w Orange > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Robert Xu <[email protected]> > >> > >> Sender: [email protected]: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 > >> 23:31:43 > >> To: Cooker OpenMandriva<[email protected]>; > >> OpenMandriva QA<[email protected]> > >> Reply-To: Cooker OpenMandriva <[email protected]> > >> > >> Subject: Re: [OM Cooker] GO/No-GO RC2 candidate 15 Nov 2013 > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> If you haven't already noticed, the ISO we're asking to test only > >> has > >> one launcher. That was a mistake, and a new ISO should be in the > >> pipes > >> for both x86_64 and i586 (bero?) that fixes that. > >> > >> In the meantime, please disregard that criteria from your testing. > >> Apologies. > >> > >> On 14 November 2013 08:51, Robert Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Sorry for the delay and short time frame on this one. I must have > >> > >> your > >> > >>> responses for this by 17:00 UTC 15 Nov. > >>> > >>> As usual, by email please. > > > > https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/openmandriva2013.0/products/53/product_ > > build_lists/1917> > >> [1] > > > > https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/openmandriva2013.0/products/54/product_ > > build_lists/1925> > >> [2] > >> > >>> Robert > >> > >> -- > >> Robert Xu :: protocol.by/rxu [3] > > > > -- > > > > May the Source be with you > > anuragbhandari.com [4] > > > > Links: > > ------ > > [1] > > https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/openmandriva2013.0/products/53/product_ > > build_lists/1917 [2] > > https://abf.rosalinux.ru/platforms/openmandriva2013.0/products/54/product_ > > build_lists/1925 [3] http://protocol.by/rxu > > [4] http://www.anuragbhandari.com I've downloaded and tested both (1950 and 1951) on 2 computers. The x86_64 .iso does not have simple welcome the i586 does. Otherwise they work.
Ben Bullard OpenMandriva QA-team Sent from Kmail off x86_64 live dvd
