Robert Xu escreveu:
> ...
>
> Well, then Cooker better unbreak itself. That's troublesome because we've
> already upgraded the toolchain and etc.
> On Dec 2, 2013 6:15 AM, "Tomasz Pawe? Gajc" <[email protected]> wrote:

  We could have a 2013.1. But I think it is better to avoid too many
forks, and keep only a single cooker fork a few months before release.
I believe a 2013.1 would need a very good reason to, e.g. some large
lts contract.

  What is really important is ensuring proper upgrades from official
releases. I only managed to get a working cooker again by installing
2013.0 and upgrading from there to cooker. My previous cooker installs
I had been updating for >4 months broke real bad (all of them
started from an openmandriva iso rc).

>> No, it will use cooker.
>> Wys?ano z BlackBerry® w Orange
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Robert Xu <[email protected]>
>> Sender: [email protected]: Sun, 1 Dec 2013
>> 18:55:34
>> To: Cooker OpenMandriva<[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: Cooker OpenMandriva <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [OM Cooker] DRAFT - Release plan for 2014.0
>>
>> On 1 December 2013 09:46, Tomasz Pawe? Gajc <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > as i mentioned on last TC meeting, i'm providing a draft release plan for
>> > 2014.0 OMV distribution release.
>> >
>> > Everything what you need is here on a dedicated wiki page for 2014.0
>> > https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/2014.0
>> > also a pdf version is attached to this e-mail.
>> >
>> > Simple steps:
>> > * Feature planing stage - we gather all needed features which we would
>> like to
>> > have - 2013-12-15
>> >
>> > I've prepared page for this, so please fill it with your ideas, but
>> first make
>> > them reasonable and "fittbale" for 2014 release cycle.
>> > https://wiki.openmandriva.org/en/2014.0/Specifications
>> >
>> > * Mass rebuild - 2014-01-20 - rebuilding and fixing all failed packages
>> >
>> > * Alpha - 2014-01-31 - releasing ISO with press anouncement
>> >
>> > * Mass rebuild - 2014-02-15 - rebuilding and fixing all failed packages
>> >
>> > * Beta - 2014-02-28 - releasing ISO with press anouncement
>> >
>> > * Version freeze - 2014-03-11 - uploading new verson of packages to
>> cokker
>> > main repository is forbidden unless Q&A will allow
>> >
>> > * RC1 - 2014-03-21 - releasing ISO with press anouncement
>> >
>> > * RC2 - 2014-04-04 - releasing ISO with press anouncement
>> >
>> > * GA - 2014-04-18 - releasing ISO with press anouncement
>> >
>> > * Maybe some release party ? :)
>> >
>> > I hope we made a clear decision in Prague and last TC meeting that we
>> want
>> > this release to be done smooth and quickly, so this means we should not
>> plan
>> > any major brakages, only keep updated kernel, gcc, xorg, perl, KDE,
>> artwork,
>> > ples few more based on accepted features.
>> > I think we should consider to release a working ARM port with 2014.
>> >
>> > RFC are welcome, also please fill the features.
>> >
>> > P.S.
>> >
>> > Sorry for not being on IRC and stuff but i got flu and feel not very
>> well.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Ok, I just need one point of clarification here:
>>
>> - Is 2014.0 using the 2013.0 repositories?
>>
>> --
>> Robert Xu :: protocol.by/rxu
>>
>>
>>
>
>


Reply via email to