I think yes, let's leave ARM for fedya.

On 04/14/2014 04:54 PM, Matthew Dawkins wrote:
OK, well I'm actually not going to erase the rpms, but just make a local backup. but ok

which arches?
just i586 & x86_64 for now?



On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Denis Silakov <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Let's follow this way. There is a risk that some packages failed
    to rebuild for omv2014, but all crucial packages should be in place.


    On 04/14/2014 04:42 PM, Matthew Dawkins wrote:
    I think I might have access now. Last time I logged in I saw that
    I had access to 2013.0, 2014.0 & cooker.

    So, just remove all *2013.0*.rpm from the 2014.0 repos?


    On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Tomasz Pawe? Gajc
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Well only Bero Have such powerfull access
        Wys?ano z BlackBerry® w Orange
        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        *From: * Denis Silakov <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *Date: *Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:37:08 +0400
        *To: *Tomasz Pawe? Gajc<[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *Cc: *<[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *Subject: *Re: FBA

        Meanwhile, I can see a lot of old packages (with omv2013.0
        distsuffix )in omv2014.0 repository (e.g.,
        FaxMail-2.3-20-omv2013.0.x86_64.rpm
        
<http://abf-downloads.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva2014.0/repository/x86_64/main/release/FaxMail-2.3-20-omv2013.0.x86_64.rpm>
        vs FaxMail-2.3-21-omv2014.0.x86_64.rpm).

        Do we really need these pacakges or maybe somebody with
        necessary permissions will just remove them (all omv2013.0
        packages for which omv2014.0 analogues exists)?

        This would really speed up repository syncing, at least the
        initial one.

        On 04/13/2014 03:27 AM, Tomasz Pawe? Gajc wrote:
        Helo Denis,

        is it possible you can swap 2013.0 for 2014.0 in Dependency tests:
        File conflicts
        Superseeded packages
        Obsoleted Packages
        Elf closure
        Alternatives

        What is most important are file conflicts and superseede/obsoleted to 
clean
        befora GA release.

        Thanks.



-- Denis Silakov, ROSA Laboratory.
        www.rosalab.ru  <http://www.rosalab.ru>









-- Denis Silakov, ROSA Laboratory.
    www.rosalab.ru  <http://www.rosalab.ru>









--
Denis Silakov, ROSA Laboratory.
www.rosalab.ru



Reply via email to