so i've cleaned 2013.0 pkgs from main in both i586/x86_64, then also i've cleaned all debuginfo pkgs from main,contrib,non-free,restricted in both i586/x86_64
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Matthew Dawkins <[email protected]> wrote: > so, main for both i586 and x86_64 are cleaned of 2013.0 pkgs > > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Matthew Dawkins <[email protected]>wrote: > >> So for i586/contrib I do not have permissions. :( >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Denis Silakov >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I think yes, let's leave ARM for fedya. >>> >>> >>> On 04/14/2014 04:54 PM, Matthew Dawkins wrote: >>> >>> OK, well I'm actually not going to erase the rpms, but just make a >>> local backup. but ok >>> >>> which arches? >>> just i586 & x86_64 for now? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Denis Silakov < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Let's follow this way. There is a risk that some packages failed to >>>> rebuild for omv2014, but all crucial packages should be in place. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 04/14/2014 04:42 PM, Matthew Dawkins wrote: >>>> >>>> I think I might have access now. Last time I logged in I saw that I >>>> had access to 2013.0, 2014.0 & cooker. >>>> >>>> So, just remove all *2013.0*.rpm from the 2014.0 repos? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Tomasz Paweł Gajc <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well only Bero Have such powerfull access >>>>> Wysłano z BlackBerry® w Orange >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> *From: * Denis Silakov <[email protected]> >>>>> *Date: *Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:37:08 +0400 >>>>> *To: *Tomasz Paweł Gajc<[email protected]> >>>>> *Cc: *<[email protected]> >>>>> *Subject: *Re: FBA >>>>> >>>>> Meanwhile, I can see a lot of old packages (with omv2013.0 >>>>> distsuffix )in omv2014.0 repository (e.g., >>>>> FaxMail-2.3-20-omv2013.0.x86_64.rpm<http://abf-downloads.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva2014.0/repository/x86_64/main/release/FaxMail-2.3-20-omv2013.0.x86_64.rpm>vs >>>>> FaxMail-2.3-21-omv2014.0.x86_64.rpm). >>>>> >>>>> Do we really need these pacakges or maybe somebody with necessary >>>>> permissions will just remove them (all omv2013.0 packages for which >>>>> omv2014.0 analogues exists)? >>>>> >>>>> This would really speed up repository syncing, at least the initial >>>>> one. >>>>> >>>>> On 04/13/2014 03:27 AM, Tomasz Paweł Gajc wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Helo Denis, >>>>> >>>>> is it possible you can swap 2013.0 for 2014.0 in Dependency tests: >>>>> File conflicts >>>>> Superseeded packages >>>>> Obsoleted Packages >>>>> Elf closure >>>>> Alternatives >>>>> >>>>> What is most important are file conflicts and superseede/obsoleted to >>>>> clean >>>>> befora GA release. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Denis Silakov, ROSA Laboratory.www.rosalab.ru >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Denis Silakov, ROSA Laboratory.www.rosalab.ru >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Denis Silakov, ROSA Laboratory.www.rosalab.ru >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
