>Clang is a piece of crap, AFIC. Nope. May we switched to clang out of season, but we did it.
>you just said : If contrib will be wiped accidentally I don't even remark It's just mine opinion. I'm not all users. And I do not really understand why do you react so seriously, bit more and you will go to me with torches. I don't so nothing criminal. 2014-09-10 0:46 GMT+04:00 [email protected] < [email protected]>: > Il 09/09/2014 22:33, Alexander Khryukin ha scritto: > > > 5 developers just for clang , how many do we have? > Not for clang, just for project debian clang. (about 17 000 packages) > 99% of all clang fixes is very helpful for us > every friday i'm looking for closed bugs in clang.debian bugzilla and > integrates patches in cooker. > > Clang is a piece of crap, AFIC. > > > You know how many srpms are in contrib? > 8218 > > > Ok so contrib is useless , and pointless to maintain? > Not useless. Just Augean stables ;) > And in future we need to look deeper in contrib and drop all stuff older > than 4 years (exlcude games) > > I guess you are on the same pills as TPG, .... > you just said : If contrib will be wiped accidentally I don't even remark > Read below if you don't remember. > > >take you figures as good, so another 10-13%, means 20-26% to me.... > Old stuff in contrib is a main reason for 20-26% > May we need to discuss to drop very old crap. > > I WAS trying to fix this. > > > >But since contrib is useless I guess my part ends here . > Contrib is good. Don't take it so close to the heart. > > Not any more . > I 'm out, if MRB users still need relations with OMA then will be > somebody else on my place, if they don't , then don't. > > I said only about *OLD STUFF*. > > I WAS trying to fix this. > > Take care. > > > > > 2014-09-09 23:47 GMT+04:00 [email protected] < > [email protected]>: > >> I don't care about lives, so debian have 5 developers just for clang , >> how many do we have? >> Ok so contrib is useless , and pointless to maintain? >> You know how many srpms are in contrib? >> 6517 in release, and and let's say that you are right and "few thousands >> packages in contrib totally outdated and not maintained by upstream for >> years" >> how about the remainig srpms, because this are srpms, not packages.each >> one generates at least 2 rpms, >> i'll let you to do the math. >> From where I'm stying you said 10-13% in main, let's just say that that >> reaming part of contrib is in a fucking good shape as main and let's >> take you figures as good, so another 10-13%, means 20-26% to me.... >> But since contrib is useless I guess my part ends here . >> Take care . >> >> >> Il 09/09/2014 21:24, Alexander Khryukin ha scritto: >> >> >Ok you know what is the manpower in debian? >> In http://clang.debian.net/ 5 persons >> >> >please take a look again at the contrib... >> If contrib will be wiped accidentally I don't even remark >> few thousands packages in contrib totally outdated and not maintained >> by upstream for years >> if you want to compare gcc vs clang you need to compare comparable >> things (500-1000 core packages in main repo) >> Now you compares a dog vs red color >> >> >> As TPG said yesterday best and simple solution to fix clang issue is >> export CC=gcc >> >> But you must read what i said, issue with LIVES related only to >> binutils. >> >> 2014-09-09 22:02 GMT+04:00 [email protected] < >> [email protected]>: >> >>> >>> Il 09/09/2014 01:19, Alexander Khryukin ha scritto: >>> >>>> Clang shows not a perfect results, but it's not disaster. >>>> As i saw on debian clang project and percent of failed packages is >>>> about 7-10% >>>> for us i think 10-13%, >>>> Very GOOD results. >>>> And repairing binutils issue will fix all errors with bad invocation >>>> (as for lives) >>>> Real clang fail results is about 5-7% like for gcc between branches 4.6 >>>> vs 4.7, 4.7 vs 4.8 etc >>>> >>>> >>>> Ok you know what is the manpower in debian? >>> >>> 10-13 % huh ? Optimistic... please take a look again at the contrib... >>> -- >>> Greetings >>> >>> ___________________ >>> >>> MRB ain't no shit >>> >>> Rosalinux.Ro >>> >>> Mandrivausers.Ro >>> >>> ________________ >>> >>> Talk is cheap, show me the code. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OM-Cooker mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OM-Cooker mailing >> [email protected]http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >> >> >> -- >> Greetings >> >> ___________________ >> >> MRB ain't no shit >> >> Rosalinux.Ro >> >> Mandrivausers.Ro >> ________________ >> >> Talk is cheap, show me the code. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OM-Cooker mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing > [email protected]http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > > > -- > Greetings > > ___________________ > > MRB ain't no shit > > Rosalinux.Ro > > Mandrivausers.Ro > ________________ > > Talk is cheap, show me the code. > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
