Quite older, but interesting resource https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-06/msg00254.html
2014-09-09 17:17 GMT+02:00 Colin Close <[email protected]>: > On Wednesday 03 Sep 2014 18:26:33 Nicolò Costanza via OM-Cooker wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > > > I am wondering if the choose of cooker jumping from gcc to llvm/clang has > > been smart, new GCC 5.0 seems much faster than LLVM/CLANG and is the > > standard linux compiler > > > > > > > > Published just now this article shows as the new GCC is much faster than > > before, surpassing by a lot the CLANG performances, and we should > consider > > that GCC has the most of support from Linux Community, all bugfix is from > > the GCC side... > > > > > > GCC 5.0 Outruns LLVM 3.5 Compiler By A Bit On Core-AVX2 > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=llvm_clang35_avx2 > > > > > > wdyt? > > > > > > bye, NicCo > > Nicco, > I think probably the next release of clang may be faster than gcc. That's > what > competition does, it improves the code. > Here's a quote from the end of the Phoronix tests. > "While Clang overall is still competitive with GCC" > Makes "outruns" sound a bit sensationalist to me. > That quote says to me that overall things balance up, > It would have been far more revealing perhaps if some of these tests had > been > performed within a virtual machine. > > Best, > Colin > > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org >
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
