I just want to point it out that Nicco is only one man ( a big one ,but
still one, :-D ) with 2 hands and also in Sicily
,even if you can swim and tan in winter, the day has 24 hours....
So I guess we should ask Nicco before taking some decisions here...
IN MY HUMBLE OPINION.
Il 17/02/2015 13:22, Tomasz Gajc ha scritto:
From my POV, person who maintains kernel should also maintain all kind
of dkms modules too, just to be certain that new kernel will work with
dkms and other stuff like kernel-firmware etc.
2015-02-17 11:33 GMT+01:00 Colin Close <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
It seems from reports from the forums indicate that the latest
kernel we have released has broken the nVidia dkms driver package
(and probably the fglrx one too). The release of packages that
break into a stable release environment that break users systems
is not something that we should be doing.
How can we ensure that this does not recur in future kernel
updates to stable releases. If no mechanism exists in ABF perhaps
we can ensure enforcement in kahinah the QA tool.
I realise that these are binary packages and that some will argue
that they are not a priority (or similar objections) but the fact
remains that if we have issued them previously for a release and
we break by some update then we should fix them as they were part
of the release. For the time being we need to fix the dkms drivers
pronto.
Colin Close
QA Team
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
