18/feb/2015 ha scritto:
>that reminds me, we have some magical penguins !
>they should become a Star .. why ?
>Because we an Private and not commercial , you see ? :)
>
>btw, when's the next elections of the OM President ?
>we should have an programmer as President,
>he knows why and give it an real well face .. you know ..
>
>normally should be all 4-6 years be an election *imho* ...
>
>best regards
>Blacky
>
>
>Am 17.02.2015 um 15:00 schrieb symbianflo:
>> I just want to point it out that Nicco is only one man ( a big one
>> ,but still one, :-D ) with 2 hands and also in Sicily
>> ,even if you can swim and tan in winter, the day has 24 hours....
>> So I guess we should ask Nicco before taking some decisions here...
>> IN MY HUMBLE OPINION.
>>
>>
>> Il 17/02/2015 13:22, Tomasz Gajc ha scritto:
>>> From my POV, person who maintains kernel should also maintain all
>>> kind of dkms modules too, just to be certain that new kernel will
>>> work with dkms and other stuff like kernel-firmware etc.
>>>
>>> 2015-02-17 11:33 GMT+01:00 Colin Close <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>
>>> It seems from reports from the forums indicate that the latest
>>> kernel we have released has broken the nVidia dkms driver
>package
>>> (and probably the fglrx one too). The release of packages that
>>> break into a stable release environment that break users systems
>>> is not something that we should be doing.
>>> How can we ensure that this does not recur in future kernel
>>> updates to stable releases. If no mechanism exists in ABF
>perhaps
>>> we can ensure enforcement in kahinah the QA tool.
>>> I realise that these are binary packages and that some will
>argue
>>> that they are not a priority (or similar objections) but the
>fact
>>> remains that if we have issued them previously for a release and
>>> we break by some update then we should fix them as they were
>part
>>> of the release. For the time being we need to fix the dkms
>>> drivers pronto.
>>>
>>>
>>> Colin Close
>>> QA Team
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OM-Cooker mailing list
>>> [email protected]
><mailto:[email protected]>
>>>
>http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OM-Cooker mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OM-Cooker mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>OM-Cooker mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
I don't think so... the President should be dam good at diplomacy, and PR, also
very skilled as pacifier.....I might have one in mind :-).
But the council must include more than one technical person....3 or 4
programmers
would be really awesome.
As for elections, I guess this ain't no a priority, right now....
-- Sent from my Asus transformer pad with K-@ Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
OM-Cooker mailing list
[email protected]
http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
