Starting June 2014(when clang got in da house) there were few segfaults on cooker. Now only plasma does this. I still doubt to enable debug packages, which will generate few additional GIB of data which will not be used very often.
Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska 28 mar 2015 17:01 "Robert Xu" <[email protected]> napisał(a): > I thought that there was very little (if any) cost to adding debug > symbols? We don't optimise extremely, and RPM will take the time to go > through and strip into a debuginfo package anyway, so why not? > > It's not just specifically Qt, but if we get segfaults on any other > piece of software too. > > On 28 March 2015 at 11:50, Tomasz Gajc <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does it make sense to build tons od debug data just to try to debug one > Qt > > bug ? > > I bet that upstream will fix that bug sooner before someone from us find > a > > real fix. > > > > IMHO building with debug is unnecessary overload without any real > benefits. > > > > Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska > > > > 28 mar 2015 15:16 "Robert Xu" <[email protected]> napisał(a): > >> > >> Can we put debug back to -g2? It makes backtraces more usable, and > >> reenables the debuginfo packages... > >> > >> On 28 Mar 2015 04:11, "Tomasz Gajc" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> By default clang uses -g0 so debug are empty > >>> > >>> Wysłano z Samsung Grand Neo Orange Polska > >>> > >>> 28 mar 2015 02:39 "Robert Xu" <[email protected]> napisał(a): > >>>> > >>>> Yeah, I'm looking on ABF - that's the thing, stuff like > >>>> https://abf.io/build_lists/2404355 no longer show any debuginfo > >>>> packages... > >>>> > >>>> On 27 March 2015 at 20:01, Raphaël Jadot <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > If I'm correct, debug packages are only on Abf, not spread on > mirrors > >>>> > > >>>> > Le vendredi 27 mars 2015, Robert Xu <[email protected]> a écrit : > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On 27 March 2015 at 07:54, Tomasz Gajc <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> >> > Alexander can you provide some debug output ? > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Out of curiosity, where are the -debuginfo packages for this? > They're > >>>> >> not in the -debuginfo repositories... did we stop generating > >>>> >> debuginfo? > >>>> >> > >>>> >> -- > >>>> >> cheers, Robert :: github.com/robxu9 > >>>> >> _______________________________________________ > >>>> >> OM-Cooker mailing list > >>>> >> [email protected] > >>>> >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > _______________________________________________ > >>>> > OM-Cooker mailing list > >>>> > [email protected] > >>>> > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> cheers, Robert :: github.com/robxu9 > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> OM-Cooker mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OM-Cooker mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OM-Cooker mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OM-Cooker mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org > > > > -- > cheers, Robert :: github.com/robxu9 > _______________________________________________ > OM-Cooker mailing list > [email protected] > http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
_______________________________________________ OM-Cooker mailing list [email protected] http://ml.openmandriva.org/listinfo.cgi/om-cooker-openmandriva.org
