On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:12:59AM +0200, Martin Bochnig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:55 PM, <johansen at sun.com> wrote: > > Conary was ready in 2007 (and since 2004/2005). > Also consider Moinak Ghosh's suggestions. > And thos of Nexenta and other, too ... > > > We have > > more features to add and more optimization to perform. > > Ulikely you will ever reach conary's speed. >
sigh. this discussion feels like ground hog day. i can't believe folks are still arguing about conary 2 years after the fact. can we please move along and stop wasting bandwith... ed
