On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Milan Jurik <Milan.Jurik at sun.com> wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Alan Coopersmith p??e v po 08. 02. 2010 v 18:00 -0800: >> ????? ???????????? wrote: >> > How is the core contributor status obtained? >> >> Another core contributor nominates you and you get at least 3 >> +1 votes and no -1 votes, as described in the constitution at: >> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+ogb/governance >> >> > Is 'core contributor' >> > equally to 'commit privilege' in the repository? >> >> No. ? There is no relationship at all between the two. >> > > If I remember well, there was some "relationship" for it in ON gate > community - the starting list was based on amount of contribution to ON > gate in previous year, but it is some time ago. But yes, technically it > is not about "commit privilege", because e.g. Jurgen Keil must go > through sponsor-request. > > Best regards,
My view (perhaps inaccurate) is that Olga has been one of the top two contributors to the ksh93 integration project. This has been a huge undertaking that has gone into ON. If I were a core contributor in ON, I would be making a nomination for Olga to have core contributor status due to contributions and interest in being part of the electorate. Perhaps there is an ON core contributor that agrees with me. -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/