On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Milan Jurik <Milan.Jurik at sun.com> wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Alan Coopersmith p??e v po 08. 02. 2010 v 18:00 -0800:
>> ????? ???????????? wrote:
>> > How is the core contributor status obtained?
>>
>> Another core contributor nominates you and you get at least 3
>> +1 votes and no -1 votes, as described in the constitution at:
>> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+ogb/governance
>>
>> > Is 'core contributor'
>> > equally to 'commit privilege' in the repository?
>>
>> No. ? There is no relationship at all between the two.
>>
>
> If I remember well, there was some "relationship" for it in ON gate
> community - the starting list was based on amount of contribution to ON
> gate in previous year, but it is some time ago. But yes, technically it
> is not about "commit privilege", because e.g. Jurgen Keil must go
> through sponsor-request.
>
> Best regards,

My view (perhaps inaccurate) is that Olga has been one of the top two
contributors to the ksh93 integration project.  This has been a huge
undertaking that has gone into ON.  If I were a core contributor in
ON, I would be making a nomination for Olga to have core contributor
status due to contributions and interest in being part of the
electorate.

Perhaps there is an ON core contributor that agrees with me.

-- 
Mike Gerdts
http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to