Thanks Catherine. I'll look forward for more details in this sub-group. BR, Viswa
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Lefevre, Catherine <[email protected]> wrote: > Good morning Viswa, > > ONAP is about to evolve drastically if you look at all the submitted > proposals that are currently under review by the ONAP TSC. > https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Proposing+A+Project > > An ONAP architecture subcommittee has been recently formed. > I believe it is a good start to understand not only what already exists > but also where ONAP will go ... > https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Architecture+Subcommittee > > Best regards > Catherine > > From: [email protected] [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@ > lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Viswa KSP > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:13 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [onap-discuss] How modular is ONAP? > > Dear All, > > I'm trying to study the architecture of ONAP from scalablity & modularity > perspective. > While most of ONAP components are dockerized, still the demo deployment is > happening via VMs in example demo deployment. > > While I understand that the release HEAT file is just a demo and not to be > taken for typical deployment use-case, I would like to understand how > modular the contents are. > > For example, assume I have my own inventory mgmt system, what effort does > it take for me to integrate that to ONAP, instead of using AAI? What if I > wanna plug-in my own SA system etc. > > Please point me to some SMEs in ONAP, so that I can continue my > discussions with them. > > BR, > Viswa >
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
