Thanks to all who joined today's joint ARC/usecase meeting.  The Zoom recording 
is now available 
https://zoom.us/recording/play/EZc2tN4iOTpsqZzkywoCrsdQg9kLjKSOshwnzG9dvQAfb1CesU8N3sHqvkWyaU0a

Chris

From: onap-arc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-arc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of Alla Goldner
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 10:25 AM
To: onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-...@lists.onap.org; 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [Onap-arc] Usecase/Arch subcommittees joint meeting on Wednesday

Hi all,

Please find here the updated agenda with preliminary questions received from 
Architecture subcommittee (thanks, Chris!):

1.            Usecase subcommittee will present R1 use cases (Yoav/Kang - vCPE, 
Chengli/Yang - vVoLTE) and provide brief overview of R2 discussions, including 
emphasizing ONAP Platform Capabilities

2.            Architecture subcommittee will present and highlight differences 
between R1 and R2 foreseen architecture, so Usecase subcommittee 
representatives can ask on that and its potential impact on use cases 
implementation, and also raise relevant issues.

3.            Architecture subcommittee will ask their use case related 
questions:
-              would the use case(s) require multi-site support?
-              multi-region/multi-domain/federation?
-              Multi-national?
-              Do we need to consider enhanced networking features (e.g., 
underlays)?
-              Can individual use cases be built from same components? (common 
APIs/models)
-              What are the challenges from the first set of use cases?
-              What technical debt have you identified?
-              Clarify business drivers and capabilities of the use cases
-              What are the functional commonalities between the use cases? Are 
there generic elements where we should focus?

Usecase subcommittee members, please try to come to the meeting prepared with 
responses, as our meeting time is limited; would also be good to start 
communicating some of the responses by emails sent both to Usecase and to 
Architecture subcommittee.

This is start of our dialogue which will continue towards R2, as we move on 
with use cases definition and architecture definition. We will also discuss 
format and frequency of our join meetings going forward.

Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:image001.png@01D31100.6269CF10]

From: Alla Goldner
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 10:35 PM
To: onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>; Yoav 
Kluger <yoav.klu...@amdocs.com<mailto:yoav.klu...@amdocs.com>>; 'Kang Xi' 
<kang...@huawei.com<mailto:kang...@huawei.com>>; 'Chengli Wang' 
<wangchen...@chinamobile.com<mailto:wangchen...@chinamobile.com>>; 'Yang Xu 
(Yang, Fixed Network)' <yang....@huawei.com<mailto:yang....@huawei.com>>; 
'Yunxia Chen' <helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>
Cc: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) 
<ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>>; Phil Robb 
<pr...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 'Kenny Paul' 
<kp...@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Usecase/Arch subcommittees joint meeting on Wednesday

Hi all,

After speaking with Chris, here is our proposal for the joint meeting on 
Wednesday:


1.      Usecase subcommittee will present R1 use cases (Yoav/Kang - vCPE, 
Chengli/Yang - vVoLTE), mostly concentrated on ONAP Platform capabilities



2.      Usecase subcommittee members are encouraged to ask questions/provide 
demands on potential functionality to be supported for the next releases


3.      Architecture subcommittee will present and highlight differences 
between R1 and R2 foreseen architecture, so Usecase subcommittee 
representatives can ask on that and its potential impact on use cases 
implementation, and also raise relevant issues.



4.      Architecture subcommittee will ask their use case related questions


5.      Both Usecase and Architecture subcommittee members are encouraged to 
send out their questions in advance, in order to make our discussions more 
effective.


This is start of our dialogue which will continue towards R2, as we move on 
with use cases definition and architecture definition. We will also discuss 
format and frequency of our join meetings going forward.


Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:image001.png@01D31100.6269CF10]

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to