Ok – I’ll add to agenda for Tuesday call
best regards Steven Wright, MBA, PhD, JD. [Tech Integration] AT&T Services Inc. 1057 Lenox Park Blvd NE, STE 4D28 Atlanta, GA 30319 P: 470.415.3156 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> www.linkedin.com/in/drstevenawright/<http://www.linkedin.com/in/drstevenawright/> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 1:47 AM To: WRIGHT, STEVEN A <[email protected]>; PATTEN, HERBERT L <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [VNFRQTS]Issues about VNFRQTS-39 Hi Steven and Herb,apt I add a new jira VNFRQTS-100 in order to solve this dilemma. It would be better if we discuss the outline of Chapter 4. https://jira.onap.org/browse/VNFRQTS-100<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_VNFRQTS-2D100&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=PVu8DKytqBISpqDc36NHSA&m=ya9QkIS19OPHo8l6szjIo4E14FNM8DuYkmPDUQNZGu8&s=MljMUYcNW2QA8TBDtvp5k4BShpZpTgJII5KnBn8XNV4&e=> Thanks, Fengyuanxing 原始邮件 发件人：冯远兴10034308 收件人： <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 抄送人： <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;张茂鹏10030173; <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 日 期 ：2017年09月08日 09:35 主 题 ：[VNFRQTS]Issues about VNFRQTS-39 Hi Steven and Herb, I saw the below code-review comment from Herb. Does it mean that I should merge the content of seed doc from Open-O into Chapter4 in the repo? I had thought in Sprint 1 it;s fine and leave the merge job to be done in the future. Here are the details: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/10721/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_-23_c_10721_&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=PVu8DKytqBISpqDc36NHSA&m=ya9QkIS19OPHo8l6szjIo4E14FNM8DuYkmPDUQNZGu8&s=jXcNajFWGBWkA71bap6rY691S8905SXg9rO6rZYvakI&e=> Herb Patten Sep 7 8:00 PM ↩ Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1 There is no part g and h on the agreed upon content of this document. This project, in sprint 1, agreed upon the structure and content of the requirements document. If you want to change that structure you should propose a change to the project and not simply add new sections to the document
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
