> DCAE should use this version instead of the 1.1.50 since it is a more advanced version aligned for Beijing.

Ok.  I mis-interpreted "it".

On 11/01/2017 10:07 AM, LANDO, MICHAEL wrote:

Since sdc has branches the work on the dependency’s continues.

Our master branch is aligned with the internal contributions done by att.

This dependency is manet to support features being add .

This is why for R1 we should use 1.1.32.

In my mail I did not say that 1.1.32 is more advanced I said that 1.1.50 is a more advanced version dedicated for Beijing.

*BR,*

*Michael Lando*

Opensource TL , SDC

AT&T Network Application Development · NetCom

Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago

···········································································

*Office*: +972 (3) 5451487

*Mobile*: +972 (54) 7833603

*e-mail*: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

*From:*HWANG, MICHAEL
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 01, 2017 4:00 PM
*To:* Lando,Michael <[email protected]>; MAHER, RANDA <[email protected]>; TIMONEY, DAN <[email protected]>; DAUGHERTY, ROBERT E <[email protected]>; FORSYTH, JAMES <[email protected]>; JI, LUSHENG <[email protected]>; Sonsino, Ofir <[email protected]>; Seshu m <[email protected]> *Cc:* Lefevre, Catherine <[email protected]>; FREEMAN, BRIAN D <[email protected]>; UNO, LARRY <[email protected]>; [email protected]; WONNELL, SKIP <[email protected]>; BRADY, PATRICK D <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: SDC sdk versions

Why is 1.1.32 "more advanced" than 1.1.50?  Isn't 1.1.50 > 1.1.32? Should 1.1.50 be removed from nexus?

I'll make the change in dcae.

On 11/01/2017 06:00 AM, LANDO, MICHAEL wrote:

    *This is the consolidation of all the info I received.*

    *Based on the input for R1 we will release version 1.1.32 of
    distribution client as release*

    *DCAE should use this version instead of the 1.1.50 since it is a
    more advanced version aligned for Beijing.*

    **

    *We will release sdc-tosca version 1.1.32 as release.*

    *SDNC should change the used version to 1.1.32 since version
    1.1.34 causes issues in different components *

    **

    **

    *Please update me if there is any issue with this.*

    **

    *<dependency>*

    *<groupId>org.openecomp.sdc.sdc-distribution-client</groupId>*

    *<artifactId>sdc-distribution-client</artifactId>*

    *</dependency>*

    Users

    *Component*

        

    *version*

    SO

        

    1.1.32-SNAPSHOT

    SDNC

        

    1.1.32-SNAPSHOT

    AA&I

        

    No response….. based on the AAI pom looks like they are using
    1.1.32-SNAPSHOT

    DCAE

        

    1.1.50

    APPC

        

    1.1.32-SNAPSHOT

    *<dependency>*

    *<groupId>org.openecomp.sdc.sdc-tosca</groupId>*

    *<artifactId>sdc-tosca</artifactId>*

    *</dependency>*

    Users

    *Component*

        

    *version*

    SO

        

    1.1.32-SNAPSHOT

    SDNC

        

    1.1.34-SNAPSHOT

    VID

        

    1.1.32-SNAPSHOT

    *BR,*

    *Michael Lando*

    Opensource TL , SDC

    AT&T Network Application Development · NetCom

    Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago

    ···········································································

    *Office*: +972 (3) 5451487

    *Mobile*: +972 (54) 7833603

    *e-mail*: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    *From:* MAHER, RANDA
    *Sent:* Tuesday, October 31, 2017 7:17 PM
    *To:* TIMONEY, DAN <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>;
    Lando,Michael <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>;
    DAUGHERTY, ROBERT E <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>;
    FORSYTH, JAMES <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; JI,
    LUSHENG <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>;
    Sonsino, Ofir <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>;
    Seshu m <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Cc:* Lefevre, Catherine <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]>; FREEMAN, BRIAN D <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]>; UNO, LARRY <[email protected]>
    <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>; WONNELL, SKIP
    <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>; BRADY, PATRICK D
    <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* RE: SDC sdk versions

    For APPC, we have the following.. Please let us know if there is a
    release version that we can move to..  Thanks, Randa

    <dependency>

    <groupId>org.openecomp.sdc.sdc-distribution-client</groupId>

    <artifactId>sdc-distribution-client</artifactId>

                <version> 1.1.32-SNAPSHOT</version>

            </dependency>

    *From:* TIMONEY, DAN
    *Sent:* Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:26 AM
    *To:* LANDO, MICHAEL <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>; DAUGHERTY, ROBERT E <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>; FORSYTH, JAMES <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>; JI, LUSHENG <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>; SONSINO, OFIR <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>; MAHER, RANDA <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>; Seshu m <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *Cc:* LEFEVRE, CATHERINE <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>; FREEMAN, BRIAN D <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>; UNO, LARRY <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: SDC sdk versions

    Michael,

    I filled in the SDNC info below.  Note – we’re still using
    SNAPSHOT versions, so if there is a release version we can use
    instead, that would be great.

    Thanks!

    Dan

    Dan Timoney

    Principal Technical Staff Member

    AT&T

    Email : [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    Office : +1 (732) 420-3226

    Mobile : +1 (201) 960-1211

    200 S Laurel Ave, Rm E2-2A03

    Middletown, NJ 08873

    *From: *"LANDO, MICHAEL" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *Date: *Tuesday, October 31, 2017 at 8:09 AM
    *To: *"TIMONEY, DAN" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>,
    "DAUGHERTY, ROBERT E" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>,
    "FORSYTH, JAMES" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, "JI,
    LUSHENG" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>,
    "SONSINO, OFIR" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>, "MAHER, RANDA" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>, Seshu m <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *Cc: *"LEFEVRE, CATHERINE" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>, "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>, "UNO, LARRY" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *Subject: *SDC sdk versions

    Hi,

    I am trying to validate what version of the SDC dependency you are
    using so that I will be able to validate they are available as
    releases in LF please reply with the version your application is
    using.

    From what I know

    *<dependency>*

    *<groupId>org.openecomp.sdc.sdc-distribution-client</groupId>*

    *<artifactId>sdc-distribution-client</artifactId>*

    *</dependency>*

    Users

    *Component*

        

    *version*

    SO

        

    SDNC

        

     1.1.32-SNAPSHOT

    AA&I

        

    DCAE

        

    APPC

        

    *<dependency>*

    *<groupId>org.openecomp.sdc.sdc-tosca</groupId>*

    *<artifactId>sdc-tosca</artifactId>*

    *</dependency>*

    Users

    *Component*

        

    *version*

    SO

        

    SDNC

        

     1.1.34-SNAPSHOT

    VID

        

    *BR,*

    *Michael Lando*

    Opensource TL , SDC

    AT&T Network Application Development · NetCom

    Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago

    ···········································································

    *Office*: +972 (3) 5451487

    *Mobile*: +972 (54) 7833603

    *e-mail*: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to