I think Kang has a script to do the vCPE use case all in one shot (the 7 minute demo :)
Brian From: Alexis de Talhouët [mailto:adetalhoue...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 11:34 AM To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com> Cc: Roger Maitland <roger.maitl...@amdocs.com>; Helen Chen <helen.c...@huawei.com>; onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; David Sauvageau <david.sauvag...@bell.ca> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][oom] OOM readiness for Beijing release Brian, For now, vFW instantiate, vFWCL instantiate has been tested and validated. vFWVL close loop (APPC LCM modifyconfig) is currently being tested. Once done, I can cover the other use cases you provided to ensure it’s working as expected. Help will be appreciated at this point. Thanks Alexis On Jan 3, 2018, at 11:30 AM, FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>> wrote: Roger, I have used OOM as well and it has made substantial progress and I think it should be used for Beijing. One thing I haven’t had a chance to check. Are all the opensource VNF uses cases successfully running off an OOM installation ? 1. vFW instantiate 2. vDNS instantiate 3. VDNS closed loop scaling with and without MultiVIM (dnsscaling vnf instantiate) 4. vFWCL instantiate 5. vFWCL closed loop (APPC LCM modifyconfig) 6. vCPE Infrastucture instantiate 7. vCPE customer vG instantiate (uses macro api into SO and generic resource API into SDNC) 8. vCPE closed loop with and without MultiVIM (restart vGMUX) 9. vIMS (Clearwater) – we havent run this in a while but if the previous instantiates work the vIMS should as well. Brian From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Roger Maitland Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 11:15 AM To: Yunxia Chen <helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>>; onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; Sauvageau, David <david.sauvag...@bell.ca<mailto:david.sauvag...@bell.ca>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][oom] OOM readiness for Beijing release Hi Helen, David is on vacation so I’ll answer - OOM is ready. The OOM team has been working with the Integration team and the entire ONAP community to create the amsterdam<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_gitweb-3Fp-3Doom.git-3Ba-3Dshortlog-3Bh-3Drefs_heads_amsterdam&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=a8o3_j9rZ_qxfABkALfHIrYohgel2N4EJVYEzCKmwJI&s=EhDAoxdNx8-Zbks0BGCLaqwTASRIWIhhqqxQxi3PcFE&e=> release of OOM which is now available. There is a continuous delivery system that deploys the master branch of all of the ONAP components with OOM – here<http://kibana.onap.info:5601/app/kibana#/dashboard/AWAtvpS63NTXK5mX2kuS?_g=(refreshInterval:(display:Off,pause:!f,value:0),time:(from:now-24h,mode:quick,to:now))&_a=(description:%27%27,filters:!(),options:(darkTheme:!f),panels:!((col:1,id:AWAts77k3NTXK5mX2kuM,panelIndex:1,row:1,size_x:8,size_y:3,type:visualization),(col:9,id:AWAtuTVI3NTXK5mX2kuP,panelIndex:2,row:1,size_x:4,size_y:3,type:visualization),(col:1,id:AWAtuBTY3NTXK5mX2kuO,panelIndex:3,row:7,size_x:6,size_y:3,type:visualization),(col:1,id:AWAttmqB3NTXK5mX2kuN,panelIndex:4,row:4,size_x:6,size_y:3,type:visualization),(col:7,id:AWAtvHtY3NTXK5mX2kuR,panelIndex:6,row:4,size_x:6,size_y:6,type:visualization)),query:(match_all:()),timeRestore:!f,title:%27CD%20Health%20Check%27,uiState:(),viewMode:view)> is the dashboard. As this system is effectively continuously evaluating ONAP health this should be very useful for the Integration team to quickly identify component submissions that result in a degradation. The initial version of DCAE support is under final testing. This version brings up the DCAE controller which then brings up the rest of the DCAE VMs. There is a discussion scheduled for tomorrow between the OOM and DCAE team on a more fully containerized solution. The OOM team is also working on deploying OpenStack DNS Designate to simply the deployment of OpenStack infrastructure required for DCAE. We’ll let the community know when this is ready. Cheers, Roger From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Yunxia Chen Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 5:25 PM To: onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; Sauvageau, David <david.sauvag...@bell.ca<mailto:david.sauvag...@bell.ca>> Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration][oom] OOM readiness for Beijing release Hi, David, Happy new year and it was very nice to talk with you at Santa Clara. Is OOM ready for Integration team to take over to test the Beijing release, maybe start with Amsterdam project first? From last meeting, it seems have a little bit issue on DCAE, has it resolved yet? Regards, Helen Chen This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=a8o3_j9rZ_qxfABkALfHIrYohgel2N4EJVYEzCKmwJI&s=C2Vka0FYpZ-9uH9cmHgCGH9EKz1xr-BzjEh67UgiwfA&e=> _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=yDcuc44LiCzLC8-Dp_PVolye9rU2_Zjlny9gJGiiCJQ&s=3LPujwBQb4dgGtd4ZmEHZckFR1p_f8EmvQOnH_aZr6Q&e=>
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
