The oom rancher/heml intall script installs 2.8 even though I am doing Amsterdam so that is probably the problem.
I'll edit the script and only use the amsterdam tested versions of rancher and helm. Is master / beijing stable for some reason I remember reading that not all the fixes in the oom amsterdam were in oom beijing yet ? Brian From: OBRIEN, FRANK MICHAEL Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 4:46 PM To: FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com>; 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [OOM] vnc portal crashloopbackoff with newest helm/rancher Brian, Sorry, first time out of 8h of meetings today. Thanks for the diligence - appreciated Beijing will only work down to helm 2.5 because it has tpl templates for variable subs (don't exist in helm 2.3) - so you will notice if you downgrade helm in master - most pods will fail immediately. Vnc-portal comes up for me without changes in both master and amsterdam (last tested 4 days ago) in openlab, openstack-private and aws, retesting azure now. I have heard about issues with /ect/hosts needing an update - but this should only affect running the apps inside portal inside the image - the container should come up. We should document anything related to the vnc-portal container being busted in https://jira.onap.org/browse/OOM-486<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__jira.onap.org_browse_OOM-2D486&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=ggVaNloyY_70VEVH7LudZ4_3ygZ4wXOgEm_PxeEREOM&s=Flp_jEcWhF7FlGBMLn1Rmd4-tRpTexu3T5rZO6Mdgrg&e=> We will be fixing/retrofitting the wiki tomorrow to archive some content and make things like config clearer. So far tested versions Amsterdam (Rancher 1.6.10 (installs Kubernetes 1.7.7), kubectl 1.7.7 (1.8.6 tested), helm 2.3.0 (client and server), docker 1.12 Beijing/master (Rancher 1.6.14 (installs Kubernetes 1.8.x, kubectl 1.8.6 (1.9.2 tested), helm 2.6.0 recommended on client/server - can upgrade to 2.8.0 Vnc-portal is one of the last to come up because of its dependencies on for example vid. On the last build for Beijing it comes up with no changes - I don't test that links to aai/policy/sdc for example work during the CD test http://jenkins.onap.info/job/oom-cd/1873/console<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__jenkins.onap.info_job_oom-2Dcd_1873_console&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=ggVaNloyY_70VEVH7LudZ4_3ygZ4wXOgEm_PxeEREOM&s=d-Squ0onkYV-sPW7zLsNED-lo5borSdSBzNmIiLJC6w&e=> The periodic SDNC failures have a jira and are related to a too small readiness check of 5 sec (Mike E. mentioned) - so ignore these for now. 20:08:32 9 pending > 0 at the 44th 15 sec interval 20:08:48 onap-aaf aaf-c68d8877c-pm47q 0/1 Running 0 13m 20:08:48 onap-portal vnc-portal-687cdf7845-wxzzt 0/1 PodInitializing 0 13m 20:08:48 onap-sdnc dmaap-listener-78f4cdb695-rtvcg 0/1 Init:0/1 1 13m 20:08:48 onap-sdnc sdnc-0 0/2 Init:0/1 1 13m 20:08:48 onap-sdnc sdnc-dbhost-0 0/2 Pending 0 13m 20:08:48 onap-sdnc sdnc-dgbuilder-8667587c65-w58mg 0/1 Init:0/1 1 13m 20:08:48 onap-sdnc sdnc-portal-6587c6dbdf-ng8h7 0/1 Init:0/1 1 13m 20:08:48 onap-sdnc ueb-listener-65d67d8557-zdd57 0/1 Init:0/1 1 13m 20:08:48 onap-vfc vfc-ztevnfmdriver-585d8db4f7-h75ll 0/1 ImagePullBackOff 0 13m 20:08:48 9 pending > 0 at the 45th 15 sec interval 20:09:04 onap-aaf aaf-c68d8877c-pm47q 0/1 Running 0 13m 20:09:04 onap-sdnc dmaap-listener-78f4cdb695-rtvcg 0/1 Init:0/1 1 14m 20:09:04 onap-sdnc sdnc-0 0/2 Init:0/1 1 14m 20:09:04 onap-sdnc sdnc-dbhost-0 0/2 Pending 0 14m 20:09:04 onap-sdnc sdnc-dgbuilder-8667587c65-w58mg 0/1 Init:0/1 1 14m 20:09:04 onap-sdnc sdnc-portal-6587c6dbdf-ng8h7 0/1 Init:0/1 1 14m 20:09:04 onap-sdnc ueb-listener-65d67d8557-zdd57 0/1 Init:0/1 1 14m 20:09:04 onap-vfc vfc-ztevnfmdriver-585d8db4f7-h75ll 0/1 ImagePullBackOff 0 13m From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of FREEMAN, BRIAN D Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 14:24 To: 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [OOM] vnc portal crashloopbackoff with newest helm/rancher I started the vnc-portal docker image separately and it comes up cleanly. Had to manually update /etc/hosts Must be something in the helm dependencies causing the crashloopbackoff. Brian From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:32 AM To: 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> Subject: RE: [OOM] vnc portal crashloopbackoff with newest helm/rancher root@onapoom3:/home/onapuser/ONAP# docker ps --all | grep vnc db9a2c7ec5b7 dorowu/ubuntu-desktop-lxde-vnc@sha256:7817dda9f734703eefd73a895d69411f2983e186c861048667fcd92e15 af612d "/startup.sh" 2 minutes ago Exited (143) 2 minutes ago k8s_vnc-portal_vnc-portal-56c8b774fb-dkm4r_onap-portal_9d56a918-1075-11e8-b191-026a60b a687a_132 439f6921a8a2 gcr.io/google_containers/pause-amd64:3.0 "/pause" 11 hours ago Up 11 hours k8s_POD_vnc-portal-56c8b774fb-dkm4r_onap-portal_9d56a918-1075-11e8-b191-026a60ba687a_0 From: FREEMAN, BRIAN D Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 9:00 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: [OOM] vnc portal crashloopbackoff with newest helm/rancher Michael, I'm using the oom _rancher_setup_1.sh (https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/8227431/oom_rancher_setup_1.sh?version=6&modificationDate=1516919271000&api=v2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_download_attachments_8227431_oom-5Francher-5Fsetup-5F1.sh-3Fversion-3D6-26modificationDate-3D1516919271000-26api-3Dv2&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=ggVaNloyY_70VEVH7LudZ4_3ygZ4wXOgEm_PxeEREOM&s=Pndl6BNQp2Id-IdGA2OIcz2ja63wEX7qfyD0ZqW6-oQ&e=>) And vnc portal isnt coming up. Cant really grab any logs on it. Most of the other components are up (had to change the public IP for dmaap in SDC AUTO.json to be the dmaap.onap-message-router comma and comma quoated strings. Do I need to revert to the earlier version of helm ? Brian This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=ggVaNloyY_70VEVH7LudZ4_3ygZ4wXOgEm_PxeEREOM&s=8BANpjbS7JPyvjvh4PyNDt6B9l8ESiQjM0tG9Dr5SqM&e=>
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
