Hello-
I don't remember this being an action out of the modelling committee
meeting yesterday. How does it compare to the action item from another
meeting that Alex, Thinh, Anatoly and myself took to work on the IM to DM
model mapping, and the mappings that have already been proposed (and
commented on) here:
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25436710
Could you please clarify.
Thank you,
Jessie
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 4:46 AM, denghui (L) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello all
>
>
>
> As agreed in modeling subcommittee meeting, we need to update the onap
> types of the data model to reflect the agreements reached in information
> model.
>
>
>
> It’s huge work to achieve the goal, in order to accelerate, 7 separate
> tasks have been created based on the current IM. We encourage interested
> people to volunteer to take the lead for particular task.
>
>
>
> The tasks including:
>
> 1. VDU: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-67
>
> 2. HPA: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-68
>
> 3. CP: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-69
>
> 4. DeploymentFlavor: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-70
>
> 5. VL: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-71
>
> 6. VNFD: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-72
>
> 7. monitor: https://jira.onap.org/browse/MODELING-73
>
>
>
> It’s expected that the lead would help provide tosca definitions on the
> contribution page (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Data+Model+align+
> with+TOSCA+NFV+Profile) and
>
> help implement related logic in SDC, APPC/VFC projects.
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot
>
>
>
> DENG Hui
>
> _______________________________________________
> onap-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
