Dear Deng, Thanks, but I need you to give me the links to the Jenkins jobs that generated these please.
I cannot perform a release without them. Thanks! Jess On Tue Jun 05 22:48:45 2018, [email protected] wrote: > Hi Jess, > > This is for modeling part, thanks a lot: > > Javatoscachecker: /org/onap/modeling/toscaparsers/Checker/1.2.0- > SNAPSHOT/Checker-1.2.0-20180605.124309- > 60.jar<https://nexus.onap.org/service/local/repositories/snapshots/content/org/onap/modeling/toscaparsers/Checker/1.2.0- > SNAPSHOT/Checker-1.2.0-20180605.124309-60.jar> > NFVParser: /org/onap/modeling/toscaparsers/nfvparser/modeling- > toscaparsers-nfvparser/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/modeling-toscaparsers-nfvparser- > 1.1.0-20180329.050338- > 7.zip<https://nexus.onap.org/service/local/repositories/snapshots/content/org/onap/modeling/toscaparsers/nfvparser/modeling- > toscaparsers-nfvparser/1.1.0-SNAPSHOT/modeling-toscaparsers-nfvparser- > 1.1.0-20180329.050338-7.zip> > > Deng Hui > > From: [email protected] [mailto:onap-discuss- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jessica Wagantall > Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 6:16 AM > To: Gildas Lanilis <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] Beijing Release: Last Mile > > No request received yet also from the modeling team. > > Thanks! > Jess > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Jessica Wagantall > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > Dear Gildas, > > Here is an update on the pending items: > > *** MUSIC *** New release version 2.5.5 needed *** > > - Working with Tom on this now. We should be releasing soon. > Reference: #56927: Music Jar Release 2.5.5 > > *** VID *** New clarification from the team *** > > - The request was placed to make a docker release but I noticed > their maven artifacts haven't been released for the specific version > used > to build their docker images. Do we approve a release of those too? > Reference: #56922: VID docker release > > *** AAF *** Pending Ram's Approval *** > > - Docker release for onap/aaf/sms and onap/aaf/smsquorumclient 2.0.0 > - Java artifacts 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/sms-client-2.0.0-20180530.111014- > 8.jar<https://nexus.onap.org/index.html#view- > repositories;snapshots~browsestorage~/org/onap/aaf/sms/sms- > client/2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/sms-client-2.0.0-20180530.111014-8.jar> > Reference: #56662: Artifacts for Release > > No release request yet from multicloud or usecase-ui teams! > > Thanks! > Jess > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Jessica Wagantall > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > Thanks a lot for this Gildas, > > Due to the importance of these releases, I will help posting here the > blockers we encounter in the RT tickets. > > Here are some blockers: > > *** AAF *** Pending Ram's Approval *** > > - Docker release for onap/aaf/sms and onap/aaf/smsquorumclient 2.0.0 > - Java artifacts 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/sms-client-2.0.0-20180530.111014- > 8.jar<https://nexus.onap.org/index.html#view- > repositories;snapshots~browsestorage~/org/onap/aaf/sms/sms- > client/2.0.0-SNAPSHOT/sms-client-2.0.0-20180530.111014-8.jar> > Reference: #56662: Artifacts for Release > > *** DMAAP *** Pending Ram's Approval *** > > - Docker release for onap/dmaap/dmaap-mr:1.1.4 > Reference: #56857: Move docker image to release repository > > *** VFC *** Yan to clarify *** > > - Email sent for 8 maven artifacts to be released, but email mentions > also docker images needed and no link to docker images jobs > - Do we just need to release the maven artifacts? if docker images > need release, please update request with corresponding docker links > from Jenkins > Reference: #56821: Please help to release VF-C R2 artifacts to > releases repo > > > Thanks! > Jess > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Gildas Lanilis > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi PTLs, > > This email is to summarize on the latest activities to reach Beijing > Release Sign-Off this Thursday, June 7, 2018. > > 1. Docker image: All projects that need to Release a new Docker > Image (and thus update accordingly the Docker manifest file) must > email LF Helpdesk by 2 pm PDT on Tuesday, June 5 including a link to > the proper specific Jenkins build job that generated the selected > candidate build (e.g. > https://jenkins.onap.org/view/oparent/job/oparent-master-release- > version-java-daily/124/). Ultimately, the Docker manifest > file<https://git.onap.org/integration/tree/version- > manifest/src/main/resources/docker-manifest.csv?h=beijing> (In Beijing > Branch) should not contain words such as “latest”, “SNAPSHOT” or > “STAGING” but only version number. If necessary, also update the Java > manifest file. All the release process is documented in > wiki<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Independent+Versioning+and+Release+Process>. > > 2. Release Notes: I have updated for most projects the “Security > Notes” within each Release Notes. Thanks to review and merge its > content (feel free to amend to fix typo, if any). Also, it is not > necessary to list in the Release Notes all issues fixed into Beijing > Release, but only the main one that were visible in Amsterdam > externally to users. Same approach for “New Features”, it is not > necessary to list all Jira Stories implemented in Beijing, but rather > focus on describing the 3-4 main features of your project. Last, > Release Notes are cumulative (all release notes go in a single file); > information for Beijing Release goes on the top of the file. > > 3. Release Sign-Off Template: The Release Sign-Off template is > available in > wiki<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Deliverables+for+Release+Sign- > Off+Milestone+Checklist+Template>. Please fill it out and keep me > posted on its availability so I can review. > Let me know if you have question, I will be glad to help. > Thanks, > Gildas > > [HuaweiLogowithName] > Gildas Lanilis > ONAP Release Manager > Santa Clara CA, USA > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Mobile: 1 415 238 6287 > > > > _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
