Hi all, If all that is needed is the new substitution mapping grammar, then it would be very easy to add to Puccini. Thank you for clarifying that. I think I may be able to add that by next week. You can track the issues here <https://github.com/tliron/puccini/issues>.
Just to be clear -- substitution_mapping has existed since TOSCA 1.0. In 1.2 mappings are added for "properties" and "interfaces". Alex -- though the core work on TOSCA 1.2 might have been finished, it is still in the public review stage. (And as usual, the spec is riddled with inconsistencies and errors.) But if this is what ETSI wants, so be it. Also, Alex, this will be a PoC. We do have a lot of TOSCA parsers in ONAP, but we also don't have an easy solution to some of the problems in SO. The hope is that Puccini can provide a solution. If not, then hopefully we will have learned something about the gaps. Unfortunately there is no "seasoned" TOSCA orchestrator that can do what we need without major modification. As for having 4 TOSCA parsers already -- ARIA is currently under vote to be retired. I will send out an announcement once the vote is finalized. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:22 AM, lishitao <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > Yes, if we want to support the VNFD design with multiple deployment > flavours, tosca-simple-profile-yaml v1.2 is required, and the most > important feature is the new substitution_mapping grammar. > > > > For single deployment flavor design with only one service template, tosca > v1.1 should be fine. > > > > Regards > > shitao > > > > *发件人**:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *代表 > *Nguyenphu, Thinh (Nokia - US/Irving) > *发送时间:* 2018年6月26日 19:05 > *收件人:* Tal Liron <[email protected]>; [email protected] > *抄送:* Michela <[email protected]>; Lando,Michael < > [email protected]> > *主题:* Re: [onap-discuss] [SO] is YAML v1.2 supported ? > > > > Hi Tai, > > We need the substitution_mapping grammar feature from TOSCA YAML v1.2. > > Thinh > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] > <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Tal Liron > *Sent:* Monday, June 25, 2018 9:25 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Cc:* Michela <[email protected]>; Lando,Michael < > [email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [SO] is YAML v1.2 supported ? > > > > I think you mean TOSCA 1.2. (YAML 1.2 is supported by most TOSCA parsers.) > > > > If you do mean TOSCA 1.2, then it is on the roadmap for Puccini which will > soon be tested as a candidate for parsing TOSCA in SO. (It currently > supports TOSCA 1.1.) > > > > What are the particular TOSCA 1.2 features that you need? > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Alex Vul <[email protected]> wrote: > > Michael, Michela, et al, > > > > To my knowledge there are no commercial or open source TOSCA > orchestrators/interpreters that support YAML 1.2 grammar. Even if SDC can > recognize the node/capability/data/etc types, our TOSCA tools are not going > to parse the templates correctly. To me this is a bigger problem that ONAP > needs to address… > > > > Best regards, > > > > Alex Vul > > Intel Corporation > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Michela > *Sent:* Monday, June 25, 2018 08:58 > *To:* [email protected]; Lando,Michael <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [onap-discuss] [SO] is YAML v1.2 supported ? > > > > HI Michael , > > Is YAML 1.2 supported in SDC for VNF onboarding ? > > If not, is there any plan to add it in R3 ? > > BR > > Michela > > > > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10587): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/10587 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/22684489/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
