I have nothing specific in mind, just everything. :) We would benefit if we can switch to using an upstream project with broad industry support. It's worth evaluating.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:19 AM 赵化冰 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tal, > Good point! > Sorry for the late, it was the national holiday in China last week. > It definitely worths looking into the > Kong, actually, the ideas behind MSB and Kong are very similar, > we could explore the enhancements borrowed from Kong what can benefit ONAP. > Do you have anything in particular in your mind? > > Cheers, > Huabing > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:49 AM Tal Liron <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi MSB folk, >> >> Kong <https://github.com/Kong/kong> 1.0 was just released. I see it as >> having some overlap with MSB, and it's used quite a lot in the enterprise. >> Perhaps it's worth looking into it as a supplement or replacement? >> >> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12870): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12870 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26443378/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
