Hi Tal, Does Kong has place if ISTIO is adopted (with ISTIO-ingress)?
Thanks Srini From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tal Liron Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 5:56 AM To: onap-discuss <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [msb] Kong 1.0 released I have nothing specific in mind, just everything. :) We would benefit if we can switch to using an upstream project with broad industry support. It's worth evaluating. On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:19 AM 赵化冰 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Tal, Good point! Sorry for the late, it was the national holiday in China last week. It definitely worths looking into the Kong, actually, the ideas behind MSB and Kong are very similar, we could explore the enhancements borrowed from Kong what can benefit ONAP. Do you have anything in particular in your mind? Cheers, Huabing On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 12:49 AM Tal Liron <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi MSB folk, Kong<https://github.com/Kong/kong> 1.0 was just released. I see it as having some overlap with MSB, and it's used quite a lot in the enterprise. Perhaps it's worth looking into it as a supplement or replacement? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#12878): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/12878 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/26443378/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
